The Lab Principal Investigator

Michael J. Pecaut, Ph.D.

Students

None

Research Tech

Erben Bayeta, M.S.

Collaborating Investigators LLU

Daila S. Gridley, Ph.D.

Denise L. Bellinger, Ph.D.

Xian Luo-Owen, Ph.D.

Paul Haerich, Ph.D.

Richard E. Hartman, Ph.D.

Lora M. Green, Ph.D.

Gregory A. Nelson, Ph.D.

Vivian Mao, M.S.

Cecile Favre, Ph.D.

Clemson

Ted A. Bateman, Ph.D.

Colorado

Virginia L. Ferguson, Ph.D.

Louis S. Stodieck, Ph.D.

KSU

Stephen Keith Chapes, Ph.D.

VCU

Michelle L. Block, Ph.D.

Collaborating Labs

LLUMC Proton Treatment Center

BioServe Space Technologies

Bateman Osteoporosis Biomechanics Laboratory

Former Students

Cara Zuccarelli Eggers, Ph.D.

Farnaz P. Baqai, Ph.D.

Kristi Haynes, C.T. (A.S.C.P.)

Cory Pan

Welcome to Our Blog

Thank you for visiting our website. We are a relatively small lab with big ideas. We are part of a much larger group of investigators known collectively as the LLUMC Molecular Radiation Biology Laboratories. It is our hope that this website will educate, communicate, and incite scientific debate. As the PI of our little group, I hope to post our data and discuss potential mechanisms, consequences, and countermeasures. With a bit of luck we'll all learn something. The links to the left include our merry band as well as collaborating investigators and laboratories. The links to the right include our archive and blogroll. The banner above will always bring you back to the main page page. Take a look around and please feel free to leave a comment on our blog (try to keep it civil and constructive) or shoot us an e-mail. - Michael " Ubertramp " Pecaut

Separating Bar

Lab Update

Posted by: Ubertramp on 2009.04.12

Categories & Tags: Gamma Radiation,Grant,Low Dose Radiation,Microgravity,NASA,New Publication,Protons,Radiation,Space Shuttle,T cell

Comments: None

It’s been a couple of months since the last update, so it’s about time.  We have some good news and some bad news.  The bad news first.  My NASA grant was turned down for funding.  I haven’t seen the review yet, so I’m not sure why.  Nor do I know who or what actually DID get funded.  Guess we’ll have to see.

Ironically (or coincidentally, I haven’t decided which), we received the acceptance letter from JAP for our third immune publication from the last shuttle flight on the same day.  The reviewers were pretty rough on us, though.  It bounced back and forth three times before they finally accepted it. Farnaz was pretty excited as this was her first publication.  Woot! Now all she has to do is finish her dissertation and graduate.  Hahaha.  It’s still an Epub ahead of print, so I don’t have a reprint.  Give it a few weeks. Read More..

Separating Bar

ASTRO: Proton Radiation Linked to Lower Risk of Second Malignancy

Posted by: Ubertramp on 2008.09.27

Categories & Tags: Cancer Risk,Protons,Radiation,Radiotherapy,Secondary Malignancies,Society Meeting

Comments: None

This just in: .

BOSTON, Sept. 22 — Proton therapy may cut the risk of a second malignancy by half compared with conventional radiation treatment, results of a retrospective comparison suggested.

Almost 13% of patients treated with photon energy developed second malignancies compared with 6.4% of those treated with proton-based radiation, Nancy Tarbell, M.D., of Harvard, reported at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology meeting here.

The rest of the article can be found here.  I still can’t get a link to the actual paper or abstract, though.

Separating Bar

Protons, Secondary Neutrons, and Cancer

Posted by: Ubertramp on

Categories & Tags: Cancer Risk,Neutrons,New Publication,Protons,Radiation,Radiotherapy,Secondary Radiation

Comments: None

There has been some controversy about secondary neutrons during proton therapy and the risk of cancer.  Here’s a recent paper which suggests the risk is very small, but not negligible, and dependent on age.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):228-35. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

Risk of developing second cancer from neutron dose in proton therapy as function of field characteristics, organ, and patient age.

Zacharatou Jarlskog C, Paganetti H.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PURPOSE: To estimate the risk of a second malignancy after treatment of a primary brain cancer using passive scattered proton beam therapy. The focus was on the cancer risk caused by neutrons outside the treatment volume and the dependency on the patient’s age. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Organ-specific neutron-equivalent doses previously calculated for eight different proton therapy brain fields were considered. Organ-specific models were applied to assess the risk of developing solid cancers and leukemia. RESULTS: The main contributors (>80%) to the neutron-induced risk are neutrons generated in the treatment head. Treatment volume can influence the risk by up to a factor of approximately 2. Young patients are subject to significantly greater risks than are adult patients because of the geometric differences and age dependency of the risk models. Breast cancer should be the main concern for females. For males, the risks of lung cancer, leukemia, and thyroid cancer were significant for pediatric patients. In contrast, leukemia was the leading risk for an adult. Most lifetime risks were <1% (70-Gy treatment). The only exceptions were breast, thyroid, and lung cancer for females. For female thyroid cancer, the treatment risk can exceed the baseline risk. CONCLUSION: The risk of developing a second malignancy from neutrons from proton beam therapy of a brain lesion is small (i.e., presumably outweighed by the therapeutic benefit) but not negligible (i.e., potentially greater than the baseline risk). The patient’s age at treatment plays a major role.

Separating Bar